Quantcast
Free Trial!
Today’s Best Stocks To Trade!  Click Here



A truly predictable intraday price pattern

By Austin Passamonte | TradingMarkets.com
Email
Print
Archives
Feedback
Email Article Link
Close X
Recipients email address
Your name
Your email
Add a note (optional)




Stocks RSS

Great Morning!

Thurday's session was interesting. A quick ramp off the opening bell went sideways for hours. We've seen this pop & flat coil pattern many times before, and so it came to pass.

S&P 500 futures rolled between R1 and R2 values from roughly 10:00am thru 2:00pm est. Once they broke 'em down back thru R1 support, it was a lead-pipe lock to tap the pivot point from there. Sure enough, they hit the daily pivot on exact low tick of the day. Some things truly are quite predictable via intraday price action when it comes to emini trading.

Russell 2000 futures lagged the S&Ps again. Popped higher, limped sideways and made the surge-driven break back thru R1 levels on its way to the daily pivot point. A bear-flag pause between 726 ~ 724 was high-odds to hit 721 or lower. Indeed it did.

We noted in yesterday's piece here that 1278 would be a prime magnet for price action to hit and stiff resistance for the bulls. That mark did have sell stops clustered there, which rained down on bulls into the afternoon swoon.

Such quick rejection off test of resistance is quite bearish indeed. Daily chart picture remains sideways gyrations in rolling consolidation, but the little signs all point toward lower price levels ahead.

Small caps remain the stalwart of stock index bulls. Price action did attempt to close back above 38% but failed to do so... no confirmation of continued strength, actually hints of weakness here as well. This index remains bullish until 715 support gives way on a daily candle close. With current trading at 719ish as we head toward the open of trading today, that downside confirmation could be mere hours away from now.

Less Is So Much More
I get a fair amount of email from traders of all experience level, and appreciate each one. I definitely learn as much about human behavior = trading by reading them as (hopefully) the email authors glean from my response.

One thing I've seen literally, honestly thousands of times in my online career has been the gross amount of information overload many traders succumb to.

It is basic human nature to assimilate information in order to find solutions for any question. That's how we are designed. Humans also have a natural compulsion to complicate things. Take one look in the den or garage of an avid golfer and just count how many discarded drivers, clubs, gadgets and widgets clutter the corners everywhere you look. The same principle of complexity and overload applies to every pursuit in life, trading included.

How many charts = workspaces have you seen with more than a couple of indicators in use? I commonly see traders trying to watch volume, MACD, stochastics, RSI, moving averages, TICK, TRIN, VIX, Fib retracements, Fib projections and trendlines all at once. Now, I'm sure there are many successful traders who manage to juggle this complexity just fine. But... is all of that really necessary?

I don't know about you, but I myself cannot make trading decisions from within a view so cluttered with indicators it'd give Stevie Wonder a headache. The good news? Such is not needed for intraday trading success.

Market Myths
It's a natural assumption of traders (been there myself) that watching a maximum amount of indicators = filtering out the highest percentage of wins. After all, when every indicator aligns correctly, how could that specific trade possibly lose?

I submit to you that when all planets align on the chart, such a trade setup may very well have 99% chance for success. Trouble is, how often does that happen in reality? Almost never. Meanwhile, traders are left to decide what action is appropriate when any seven out of twelve indicators are bullish while the rest are bearish or neutral. That is what the vast majority of trade setups look like inside cluttered charts... confusing.

Anyone who wants to watch a chart workspace more complex than aircraft controllers could decipher are of course most welcome to do so. By the same token, traders who actually enjoy hours and hours of charting and research in attempts to guess (correct word) which way next for price action may derive more out of the process than just potential to make money. Believe it or not, there are all sorts of emotional rewards available in the trading profession beside monetary gain. Topic for discussion some other time.

Vendors who offer information to the public unwittingly promote the concept that more is more. I have purchased numerous educational packages for hundreds and (many times) thousands of dollars to learn what I can from each. In all honesty, I myself have always learned the most pertinent info from the smaller, concise packages. Slap a mega-hundred page manual and/or multi-disc DVD package with endless hours of digestion upon me, and I'm sure to quit studying that approach far sooner than the end.

Perhaps people believe they get their money's worth from an educational package that doubles as a boat anchor. At this advanced stage of my evolution as a trader, I firmly feel that less is decidedly more.

These days, my workstation for emini trading consists of two charts, and only one of the charts is really necessary. The other is still there to make me feel good... it helps. I watch one custom indicator that turns green when price action is likely to continue higher, and it turns red when price action is likely to continue lower. At a glance it is very clear whether the emini market is in buy or sell mode. No darting of the eyes across a half-dozen flittering filters trying to discern which is doing what.

Once the quick glance shows bias indicator red or green, I simply wait for short or long signals to confirm on the chart. Patience pays in this game... true for all timeframe of traders. Of course the process does require some degree of thought and decision making on my part. But, the thought sequence is brief and simple as possible. I require a trading method that is simple, clear and visual for my own success. Traders who are smarter and/or more intellectual than me might be able to manage a workspace that resembles the space shuttle's instrument panel. In all honesty, I cannot. The good news is, none of that is necessary in order to enjoy methodical trading success.

Summation
As I always say, there are at least 1,000 ways to succeed as a trader. The number of ways to fail are fewer. One of the major stumbling blocks on our individual roads to success is trade signal complexity. The gist of trading lies heavily towards trade management. Ideal entries are easiest to learn. I prefer to spend my time and focus on maximizing trade management efficiency. That includes taking one trade after another in the natural process of profit & loss. The easier it is to see = act upon valid trade entries, the more enjoyable my profession is to me.

I would respectfully suggest each of us take a close look at our charts today. If it requires more than five seconds to determine if we should be short, long or flat, our decision process is inhibited. One way of making our trade entry process more efficient is to reduce the number of data points needed for decision. Red or green at a glance works for me, but to each their own.

Trade To Win
 

Austin P
www.CoiledMarkets.com
[
Online video clip tutorials... open access]


>> See more articles by Austin Passamonte
Stocks RSS
Related Articles
More Related Articles >>
PREMIER SPONSORED LINKS
TRADE CENTER
 
RELATED SITES
Nothing but forex
Please call 1-213-955-5858 ext. 1

About TradingMarkets | Contact | Advertise | Careers | Link to Us | Site Map | Help | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Return Policy | Testimonials | Feedback


All analyst commentary provided on TradingMarkets.com is provided for educational purposes only. The analysts and employees or affiliates of TradingMarkets.com may hold positions in the stocks or industries discussed here. This information is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Your use of this and all information contained on TradingMarkets.com is governed by the Terms and Conditions of Use. Please click the link to view those terms. Follow this link to read our Editorial Policy.

© 2008 The Connors Group, Inc.